^
( >-< )
Ole_Ship ^ Fulcfrom ^ COMPASS
_____________
#%;&sign
----- Forwarded Message
----- Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 4:49:27 PM
---- Subject: Listen Clearly
---- Subject: Listen Clearly
---- Re-Written(edited or rewritten and formatted; simply.)
---- To: Read Clearly (simply re-written;
...Form: And I am still not sure what kind of sense to make out of this:
This is not a lesson or a letter of repremand.
This is simply an observation.
Once the obsevation is understood, then you can draw your own questions.
Then, It is a test.
Is there always an Answer?
There is no question in the final conclusion.
Understanding the English, the language, the que...
Observing the ball, the stick, the pocket, the pull.
Wool, is that an exotic material?
Billiard balls relay with felt on the table to land in your pocket.
What for? Why Felt?
The pockets differ in both style and function, some route to return back.
Racked together, the sound of a break...
Concider that Hearing and Listening are delicate processes
that require some concentration to do both at the same time.
Then understanding that, because of their similarities, differentiating
between which of the two is difficult to discern.
Reading and writing may be writen as casually as any moment in speaking, or
or drawn out within an archeatecture for a great technical concern for interpretation.
"Leadership commands" differ from the technicalities of "commanding leadership".
Last week I listened to piece of news
but preferred to search it later on the internet,
as it was a speaking occaision of our President on
all networks.
What was it he said; as I was sure it was exact-"LISTEN TO ME CLEARLY..."?
...and to whom?
That I do not know, but I do not think it was a reporter, but more anyone who would ask that question.
So what was the question?
Listen clearly to a way that it may not matter, at least not to the speeker.
My search continued for a while...
But now the transcripts show nothing, where I have looked within the timelines.
Nothing IN THAT WAY as written...
Nore could I find it Keyword searching, "as noted", and nore at all for even a MisHeard
"Let me make myself clear",.... (big difference).
Importance -
That was, at the moment I heard that, the Point Of Turning Away,
for he was bitter and speaking in a scolding way and chastising in manor;
Myself not knowing the contexts and only hearing 30 seconds or so before,
was a mention of the Mosque building at Ground-Zero issue in NYCity; and
that with the given, the speech dialogue, subject known, and in his furthering
of his concepts I heard, AT THAT MOMENT, THEY were tooo demanding
in attitude.
SO,
No Interest in Listening,
NOT with the attitude spoken
nor for the subject and topic,
to listen to ANY MORE at that moment.
Now I dont even have the date, as this draft had changed each day to the date saved.
Of his spoken words in question with-in the speach:
To inerpret just the word or text value to start, involves two entirely different attitudes,
and also, either WAY would presume a different demeanor of "values and principles"
, whether to accept or except..
...or of either- not another choice was presented, though as a Free Country,
we all know we do not ""have to"", and that there are other
reasonings THAT WE ARE endowed BY...
...whatever...AND we have our rights...
(THIS LETTER OF OBSERVATION SHOULDN'T DRIFT THAT DIRECTION)
The rest of this is from my own notes serached and a few
others may have researched, enough for me to note here.
MAYBE I'll get back to that quote,
...PUZZLED
...COULD a remark by the President just last week suddenly really
be unavailable in transcripts, forums, or any searchEngine results
by any title or keywords"??
?-No Way... .
...so odviously, I knew I must search other content , contexts, ect...
ALL I CAN HOPE IS THAT WHAT I GATHERED TO THIS POINT
IN THE DRAFT MAKES SOME SENSE ENOUGH TO EVALUATE AND
LEAD FROM A POINT OF WISDOM, WITH WHATEVER THE DETAILS
ARE TO CONCIDER WITHIN THE DISCERNING.
AND ...WITH, OR WITHOUT, THE KNOWLEDGE.
- First, about listening!
- Then I add the daily news([boxed in table below]}
- and finaly, then after, I bring this to a close...(SCROLL DOWN)
First, about listening!
Then I add the daily news([boxed in table below]}
and finaly, then after, I bring this to a close...(SCROLL DOWN)
Ole_Ship ^ Fulcfrom ^ COMPASS
EDITED INTO SOMETHING LEGIBLE
________?A More Down To Planet Earth VERSION?_________
North
West EARTH East
South
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Abbove all, Love!In what I write herethat others can find it
Ole_Ship ^ Fulcfrom ^ COMPASS
EDITED INTO SOMETHING LEGIBLE
________?A More Down To Planet Earth VERSION?_________
North
West EARTH East
South
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Abbove all, Love!
In what I write here
that others can find it
- REMEMBER Most Of what is written here is by other authors, and probably has copyrites.
- In my many points, that I attempt myself to make, i've told others about a "liveable with" liveyhood, "to seek God first, and pray",within a practical reasoning to condition, and to continue ...pray, fast, study, and live and work/ each in faith...
- I often forget details when not knowing what a person is/was/has finaly lead up to; and have found for myself, that in that point, it is helpful to know- that- God is seeking you, or us, also!
- With that in mind, a "please ReEvaluate"...becomes part of listening, if your faith knows you heard it.
- Suppose an "exuse me, you can not revalue" the faith that wasn't yours, though it assumed you into context.
- Pray (i,e. : observation
- "In the life of the Indian there was onlyone inevitable duty, the duty of prayer,the daily recognition of the Unseen andEternal. His daily devotions were morenecessary to him than daily food."-Charles A. Eastman (Ohiyesa)SANTEE SIOUXThe most important habit one can develop isthe daily act of prayer. Prayer is our eyes, ourears, our feelings, our success, our guidance,our life, our duty, our goal. There really isonly prayer and meditation. We can only helpothers through prayer. We can only help our-selves through prayer. You can never becomean Elder unless you pray. You can never stayan Elder unless you pray. You never get wis-dom unless you pray. You never understandlove unless you pray.Great Spirit,today, teachme to pray.By: Don Coyhis
-
- Iconic images from tragic events of 9/11 | See the memorable images from the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Photos | Karzai appeals over civilian deaths | Ground Zero
- SO WHAT , I've heard of "right-wing conspired" theories/
- EVERYONE HAS
- This 1 i haven't heard of:
- 9/11 film doc says Clintons directed from left wing
August 15, 2008|Lynn Smith, Times Staff WriterIn Hollywood docudramas, when the phrase "miscarriage of justice" is employed,it usually applies to the film's subject, not its creators.But a new documentary called "Blocking the Path to 9/11," to be given a screening tonight, makes the case that former President Bill Clinton and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton have pressured television and studio executives into quashing the DVDrelease of ABC's 2006 miniseries â01CThe Path to 9/11."The privately financed documentary argues that the Clintons, who decried the original miniseries as a right-wing hatchet job, are out to salvage their political influence and legacy at the expense of free expression.a two-part miniseries that placed the blame for the September 11, 2001, .... As noted in the documentary, Disney/ABC denies this and claims the decision ... From Clinton Administration Urge Disney to Cancel or Revise 9/11 Mini-Series. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_9/11 -The Path to 9/11 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
a two-part miniseries that placed the blame for the September 11, 2001, .... As noted in the documentary, Disney/ABC denies this and claims the decision not ... Retrieved May 25, 2010. ^ "Is Clinton's candidacy blocking 'Path to 9/11'? ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Path_to_9/11 - - SimilarCyrus Nowrasteh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
As noted in the documentary, Disney/ABC denies this and claims the decision not to release a DVD ... "...the point of my documentary is not to 'blame' 9/11 on Bill Clinton. .... This page was last modified on 30 August 2010 at 16:29. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_Nowrasteh - Similar -
- A monopoly condemned by the Sherman Act is the power to fix prices, or exclude competition, coupled with policies designed to use and preserve that power. â01D
- ^ THAT WAS FROM(Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition) The description con-
- -tinues-
- (CONTINUED: The Federal Reserve Act goes one step farther, â01CNo Senator or Representative in Congress shall be a member of the Federal Reserve Board or
- an officer or director of a Federal Reserve Bank.â01D They didnâ019t want "We The People" to have any say in the operation of their monopoly through our elected officials.
- Recall the quote from John Mayard Keynes:
â01CThere is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of
society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden
forces of economic laws on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner
which not one in a million is able to diagnose.â01D
Keynes seems to be quite accurate in his statement.
... So far, anyway.....
...(ANYWAY, I ADDED THAT NOTE AND LINKED FOR ANY THOUGHTS TO THE SANCTITY OF THE USE OR PURPOSES RELATED TO MONEY)
- "AMERICAN ENGLISH" CONJUGATE "LISTEN TO" WHO WHOSE WHOM
- Sacred site means any specific, discrete, narrowly delineated > location on Federal land that is identified by an Indian tribe, or an > Indian individual determined to be an appropriately authoritative > representative of an Indian religion, as sacred by virtue of its > established religious significance to or ceremonial use by, an Indian > religion; provided that the tribe or appropriately authoritative > representative of an Indian religion has informed the Department of > the Interior of such a site.Before I ever showed up at the Native American Sacred Lands Forum, I knewthat I wanted to record how people were feeling. It appears that others weremore interested in what people were saying. And here is how I found out:As I was in the process of summarizing Tuesdayâ019s panel presentations, Icompared my handwritten notes with the first-draft transcriptions of the videorecordings. My notes show Chris Peters, Pemina Yellow Bird and CharlesWilkinson (a white man who knows from experience about Thunder) allacknowledged the thunderstorm that raged outside the open windows of thehall. Thunder Beings often visit to show their interest in our doings. They oftenbring rain to bless the people in their endeavors. They showed themselves â015brash and noisy â015 in Boulder while we talked about how to protect lands thatare sacred and precious to tribal Native Americans.But the transcriptions did not contain the panelistsâ019 comments about thethunder and rain. The transcriber did not feel it was necessary to record them,apparently feeling that those comments were extraneous. Whether or not thetranscriber was in the room while the thunderstorm was raging, she eitherdidnâ019t hear or didnâ019t notice the Thunder Beings when they made themselvesknown in the wind, rain, lightning and thunder, and she certainly didnâ019t thinkthe event was worth recording. This points to an interesting but critical differencebetween Native and non-Native thinking.Many or most tribes believe and acknowledge that there are beings on thisearth whom we cannot see, but who have power greater than humans. TheThunder Beings are such ones. Many Native Peoples pray to the Thunders andothers for help on a regular basis. So when the Sacred Lands Forum wasopened with prayer, and when the panelists began their presentations aboutsacred subjects, and when the wind started to blow and the lightning flashedand the thunder cracked and rumbled, the speakers acknowledged theThunders and thanked them for their presence at our meeting.Meetings that are called to talk about sacred or spiritual subjects are oftenvisited by the Thunder Beings, who come with the powerful rain. NativePeoples accept and welcome such visits, and acknowledge them, because weare truly grateful for the power lent to us by the spirit beings. They are part ofthe natural world, just as humans are â015 living, thinking and acting. NativePeople acknowledge this; non-Natives often do not.Laws that are made by non-Native governments reflect this differencebetween cultures. Those laws ignore spiritual necessities of Native Peoples, thestrong relationship between humans and our natural environment. This is thevery reason this Sacred Lands Forum was called, to discuss ways to convinceviinon-Natives that we ignore the spiritual aspects of the environment at ourperil. Therefore, it was especially significant that the transcriber did not feelthat any mention of the Thunders should be a part of the official record of theproceedings. This is not meant to criticize the transcriber, but only to showthat different cultures assign priorities for drastically different cultural reasons,and the process is unconscious and automatic, and very often harmful tothose on the wrong end of the assumption. (The verbatim comments aboutthe Thunders have since been added to the transcription in Appendix 1.)If we are to be truly successful in any effort to change legislation and policy,we must change the way we perceive and react to cultures other than our own.We must learn how and why each culture believes and acts in a certain way,and must make room for (or accommodate, as some would say) the differencesby crafting laws that allow for the different beliefs, avoiding harmfulimpacts on the groups most likely to be affected â015 in this case, Native Peoplesand our sacred places. Protecting the sacred from harm requires education,thoughtfulness and constant vigilance to be sure that we are accurate in ourassumptions and appropriate in our actions. The necessity of educationbecame a refrain that rang many times during the short two days of theForum.Marlon ShermanIndian Dispute Resolution ServicesviiiABOUT THE REPORTâ5A0 This report conveys both the literal content and the essence of the two-daydialogue. The following executive summary provides background on theevents leading up to the Forum and a summary of the Forumâ019s recommendations,including those made by the working groups which focused on six areas:education, Native leadership, legal tools and legislation, land managementpolicies, consultation, and an additional â01Call relevant issuesâ01D category. Subsequentsections and appendices contain summaries and transcripts of panelistsâ019remarks from the opening session (Tuesday), a narrative summary ofthe recommendations of the second dayâ019s (Wednesdayâ019s) working groups, andtranscribed notes from their deliberations. The report concludes with recommendationsand observations about the Forum for consideration by organizersof future dialogue sessions. Appendices list forum participants and theircontact information, and provide a summary of the various laws and agencypolicies relating to sacred lands, including relevant web sites.The report was drafted by Lakota author Marlon Sherman of IndianDispute Resolution Services. It is based on his observations at the forum, supplementedby videotapes, transcripts and notes of the session participants.Summaries of the small groups were reviewed in draft by a number of Forumparticipants. Several drafts of the entire report were reviewed by the Forumplanning committee. The final draft document was sent to all Forum participantsfor comments. Many of these reviewers provided comments that wereincorporated into the final report.ixEXECUTIVE SUMMARYPurpose of the Forumâ5A0 Sacred landscapes, large and small, are a central concern to NativeAmerican nations, communities, spiritual leaders and activists. Sacred placesembody values, beliefs, spirits, history, ceremonies, relationships and secrets.Sacred sites are at the core of cultural identity and health. Their protection andcare is an ancient mandate and life-giving covenant. Yet hundreds of diversenative communities, whether recognized by the Federal government or not,have long watched sacred places threatened or destroyed by pothunters,extractive industries, government agencies, recreational interests and New Agespiritual seekers. The American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 failed toprotect sacred lands and Executive Order 13007 of 1996 has been marginallyeffective. The National Environmental Policy Act and the National HistoricPreservation Act, while potentially more useful, have not been adequate. Theneed for dialogue, critical thinking, and a constructive, forward-looking strategyis clear.The Native American Sacred Lands Forum (the Forum) was called becauseof a voiced need by Native Americans to find solutions to the very serious lackof protection given to sites and issues considered sacred by tribes.
TO WHOM NOT....
- One thing we know about Barack Obama is that he is committed to ruling in direct opposition to three-fourths of the American people on all core issues-PRESS- -REPORT: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/site/comments/obama-okays-victory-mosque/.
"...", within a Holiday frame of mind I do wonder in this note...
... myself:
...For those that survived the battles and wars of history and of many who are still livingtoday; of those ways of so many, as if we all shared in dieing a little, we died not, andeventually must ammend our ways to just that; our living. We each can now act sensiblyif we want to for the time is set aside by those before us, which almost depends on thoseage old causes to eventually have their place resolved in history; and a day we can stilltend to ourselves, being both cautious and assertive to our personal and family while alsoto community themes.
Another quote: This one by The Late Robert Ghostwolf:
It is said that our Lord spoke of His fathers house having many mansions.That there was room enough for all who chose to come. He spoke also of having othersheep to tend to, and that they too He must gather, for the kingdom......These are some words He spoke about The Time of His Return that come fromthe European Bible; The King James Version.
Blessings from the Light Rev. Dr. Robert Ghost Wolf
1 through 4 of 4 matching documents, best matches first. sort by date |
1: | www.ChristianKeys.ca - Macrobiotics and Health Page 4 My doctor labeled her an astrocytoma and his only solution was radiation. But I clearly ... riveted, and I thought it prudent to listen carefully. "Yes, I was scared and confused. ... http://www.christiankeys.ca/Macrobiotics4.html | 87% Size: 4K Depth: 2 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
2: | www.ChristianKeys.ca - Macrobiotics and Health Page 27 ... do these deadly cocktails contain. Governments have scientists. Don't they listen to them? ... And militarized quarantine regulations. More info on the what appears more clearly each ... http://www.christiankeys.ca/Macrobiotics27.html | 84% Size: 27K Depth: 2 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
3: | www.ChristianKeys.ca - Paul - Life and Epistles of Saint Paul ... We must listen to his words, if we would learn to know him. If fancy did her utmost, she ... And moreover the great difficulty in understanding his argument is to trace clearly the ... http://www.christiankeys.ca/LifeAndEpistlesOfPaul.html | 83% Size: 26K Depth: 2 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
4: | Articles - Coast to Coast AM ... Listen to the solar music at Telegraph.co.uk. Exoplanet Bonanza NASA's new Kepler space ... This massive 170-pound rock has created a stir in Merced, California. Clearly out of place ... http://www.coasttocoastam.com/... es/science-space-technology and again Ole_ship Page 2 Size: 7K Depth: 1 Rank: 93% http://www.geocities.com/ole_ship/page2.html [Find Similar] [Match Info] [Show Parents] | 81% Size: 47K Depth: 2 Find Similar Match Info Show Parents |
"Listen to me clearly", listen for yourselves and for others,
and listen to others, then listen to yourselfs again; and after all that,
is it clearly "for" or "to" as it sounds?
^
( >-< )
Ole_Ship ^ Fulcfrom ^ COMPASS
_____________
#%;&sign
________________________________________________ Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
No comments:
Post a Comment